The trial continued 113/PHPU.D-IX/2011 case numbers on Election Result Dispute (PHPU) Head of Buru regency was held back in the Constitutional Court, Monday (14/11). In this evidentiary hearing, Maksin Bugis as Related Parties presented witnesses who stated that with regard to intimidation carried out by the Regent of Buru during campaigns, saying it is not true.

"In the campaign, both political speech and political speech, no language, words, or phrases that lead to the intimidation. As for the language, words and sentences that conveyed only the relevance of the campaign, "said the first witness presented by the Related Parties, Ramli Uma Sufi and Juhana Sudrajat as partner no. a sequence that, when giving a statement before the panel of judges, including Achmad Sodiki (Chairman), Harjono, and Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi.

Meanwhile, the alleged use of state facilities involving the Regent of Buru, according Maksin, it is untrue and unwarranted, because during the campaign, Vice Regent or candidate number 1 Ramly Umasugi Police use of private vehicles numbered 3 R RRM white. "While the police service vehicles numbered red plate, numbered DE 5 DM," said Maksin it.

Another witness, namely Wara as the Head of Department of Agriculture District Buru explain the withdrawal. In his statement, he said that the tractor was not withdrawn but diverted, diverted from the members of farmer groups to the coordinator of the farmer groups. Why is pulled? According to him because all this is expected every handtracktor given, should be exploited by interest groups. "It turned out that after the evaluation is responsible Sunaryo. He use to private interests, "explained Wara.

Head of District of Buru Tamsil Chatib, the next witness presented by the Related Parties to explain about the allegations about the involvement Ardiansyah Asdar officials who attended the campaign. According to him, it is true there is a meeting held on October 9, at the Village and Village Kubalahin Waeploi. "However, it is a meeting friendship with the Regent of Buru people in remote indigenous communities," explained Tamsil.

Previously, the judges also heard testimony from the Respondent the District Election Commission. Buru. In this case, all witnesses who support the arguments presented by Respondent, including Hasan Waplau Leatemia of KDP. In his explanation, he said that starting from the election until the counting of votes from 22 polling stations in the District Waplau, it has nothing at all witnesses who object.” The protests were not there," explained Hasan.

This, In line delivered by the next witness, namely Dodin KPPS Buton as Chairman of TPS 3 Village Coral Jaya. In his statement, he said that prior to the ongoing implementation of the ballot, he had read the circular letter submitted by Buru Commission regarding the requirement to vote. Thus, all voters use in choosing invitations in TPS 3 Village Coral Jaya. Furthermore, the protests of time counting the voting time alleged by the Petitioner, in his opinion, no.

After finished listening to evidence from the Petitioner, Respondent and the Related Parties as well as Leaders Meeting Achmad Sodiki said that all parties are asked to draw up a conclusion. "On Tuesday tomorrow, at 16.00 pm, no later than yes," said Sodiki. (Shohibul Umam / mh/Yazid.tr)